303.353.0505

Judging from the performance of Potbelly Corporation (NASDAQ:PBPB) IPO on Friday, franchise remains a popular investment concept in Wall Street—the company operates and franchises Sandwich Works shops in the US.

But as is the case with other investment, not every franchise is successful. And even among successful franchise chains, some fare better than others. McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD) and Yum Brands (NYSE:YUM), for instance, have fared much better (in terms of equity performance) than Wendy’s (NASDAQ:WEN).

What Makes the Difference? Five Things

home-improvement-franchise-paint

1.The Right Business Model

The way the chain enhances customer value vis-à-vis the competition. Franchise pioneer McDonald’s, for instance, delivers customers a quick, convenient and inexpensive meal, vis-à-vis traditional restaurants.  KFC offers the same meal attributes but with a different menu—focusing on chicken rather than hamburgers—though both chains broadened their menu portfolio overtime, adjusting it to the local tastes.

Dunkin Donuts offers coffee and donuts (and in recent years ice-cream) to go at convenient locations.

2. Scale

Cost savings associated with a larger production scale of a standardized menu–the bigger the production scale, the lower the cost per menu.  With 33,510 units around the world, for instance, McDonald’s has a scale advantage over Wendy’s, which has 9,792 stores.

Company Rank Worldwide Sales ($M) Domestic Units International Units Total TOT +0.35% Units
McDonald’s 1 85,941 14,098 19,412 33,510
KFC (Yum Brands) 3 21,300 4,780 12,621 17,401
Pot Belly 286 12 298
Pizza Hut (Yum Brands) 6 12,626 7,600 6,147 13,747
Wendy’s 18 6,004 6,772 3,020 9,792
Panera Bread 33 3,421 1,538 3 1,541
Dunkin’ Donuts (Dunkin Brands) 18 6,004 6,792 3,020 9,792

The scale advantage is reflected in the operating margins of the two companies. McDonald’s enjoys a hefty 30.12 percent operating margin, versus 7.38 percent of Wendy’s.

Company OperatingMargins (%) Return on Assets (%) Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy) Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy)
McDonald’s 30.13 15.42 0.90 0.30
Berger King 31.95 6.17 -42.50 150.3
Wendy’s 7.38 2.72 1.80 -82.7
Dunkin Brands 39.23 5.22 6.20 -8.30
Panera Bread 8.22 15.64 12.70 16.80
Yum Brands 15.05 13.80 -8.30 -15.10

Source: Yahoo YHOO +0%.Finance.com

3. Scope

The cost savings associated with the offering for sale of different products by a single corporation rather than by different corporations. McDonald’s and Panera Bread, for instance, offer a variety of products for sale (McDonald’s has added Mccaffe in many locations), vis-a-vis Wendy’s and Dunkin Brands. That can explain the higher return on assets.

4. Location

The benefits associated with occupying primary location sites for franchise stores. In fact, location can support and re-enforce all these advantages. As an older franchise McDonald’s, for instance, had the opportunity to pick best locations. This further explains both the hefty operating margins and the high return on assets.

5. Market Saturation

The degree of market penetration. The lower the degree of penetration, the higher the room for the company to grow by opening new stores. Potbelly and Panera Bread, for instance, have more room to grow, vis-à-vis McDonald’s and Yum Brands.

The bottom line: Successful franchise chains begin with the right business model, and proceed with the amassing of the right scale and scope in the right locations, until they reach optimum market saturation.

Read the original article here.

%d bloggers like this: